Zero-trust in industrial networks: real-world applications and critical issues

Zero-trust

Digital transformation has radically changed the cyber threat landscape in the industrial sector. Attacks on critical systems have increased 300% in the last five years, exposing structural vulnerabilities in traditional infrastructures. The IT/OT convergence requires a fundamental rethinking of security approaches. Cybersecurity solution design must now consider scenarios in which single breaches can cause tangible physical consequences, from failures to service interruptions. Zero-trust in industrial networks emerges as a strategic response in a context where the attack surface is continually expanding and the distinction between inside and outside is increasingly blurred.

What is the Zero-Trust model and why apply it to OT

The Zero-Trust model represents an approach to cybersecurity based on the principle of “never trust, always verify.” Unlike traditional perimeter security systems, this paradigm completely eliminates the concept of a trusted internal network, treating every access request as potentially hostile regardless of its origin. In modern industrial networks, the application of this model becomes crucial due to the increasing interconnection between operational (OT) and information (IT) systems. The IT-OT convergence has created new attack surfaces that traditional perimeter security approaches can no longer adequately protect. Industrial control systems, originally designed to operate in isolation, are now connected to corporate networks and even the cloud, exposing them to sophisticated cyber threats.

Zero-trust in industrial networks addresses the need to protect environments where the consequences of a breach can be catastrophic. Unlike traditional IT systems, an attack on OT systems can cause physical damage, production disruptions, personnel safety issues, and even environmental impacts. The value of this approach lies in its ability to adapt to the complexity of modern industrial ecosystems. By implementing the principles of least privilege and continuous verification, organizations can significantly reduce the attack surface and contain potential breaches before they spread. Adopting the Zero-Trust model in OT is not only a response to current threats, but a proactive strategy to address an ever-evolving threat landscape. This approach allows for a robust security posture that does not compromise operational efficiency, a critical aspect in industrial environments where availability and integrity are paramount.

Zero-trust in industrial networks: authentication, access control, and segmentation

Implementing the zero-trust model in industrial networks requires a multidimensional approach that integrates multiple layers of protection. This paradigm is based on three fundamental pillars: robust authentication, granular access control, and advanced microsegmentation. Authentication is the first layer of defense and must go beyond traditional username/password credentials. In industrial settings, this may include implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA), digital certificates, and, where applicable, biometric solutions. The principle of least privilege governs access control, ensuring that each user or system has only the authorizations necessary to perform their specific functions.

This approach drastically limits an attacker’s ability to move laterally within the network in the event of an initial compromise. Network segmentation is a crucial element of the Zero-Trust strategy, dividing the OT environment into isolated zones with specific security requirements. In a hybrid architecture combining modern and legacy technologies, micro-segmentation creates virtual perimeters around individual assets or functional groups. Continuous monitoring of network activity is a key aspect of this model. Behavioral analytics-based detection technologies can identify anomalies that signal potential compromise, even in the presence of proprietary industrial protocols. Complete visibility of assets and communications is the foundation upon which the entire Zero-Trust framework is based.

Accurate and constantly updated inventories, combined with detailed maps of communication flows, establish a behavioral baseline against which suspicious deviations can be identified. Implementing these principles requires a balance between security and operational efficiency, ensuring that security controls do not interfere with critical industrial processes that often require real-time responses and continuous availability.

Implementation Challenges on Legacy Devices

Applying the Zero-Trust model in industrial networks faces significant challenges when it comes to integrating legacy devices. These components, often developed decades ago, have structural limitations that complicate the adoption of modern security practices. Legacy industrial systems typically lack basic security features such as advanced authentication, native encryption, detailed logging capabilities, or the ability to receive security updates.

Many operate with proprietary protocols designed in an era before external connectivity was even considered. Replacing these devices is rarely a viable option due to prohibitive costs, risks of operational disruption, and dependency on specialized processes refined over time. This necessitates a pragmatic approach that involves implementing compensating controls around legacy systems. Mitigation strategies include the use of security gateways that act as intermediaries between legacy devices and the rest of the network, protocol proxies that can implement additional security features, and passive monitoring systems that detect anomalous behavior without interfering with operations.

Network segmentation becomes particularly crucial, isolating legacy devices in restricted areas with strengthened perimeter controls. Digital infrastructure must be redesigned to contain these vulnerable segments, strictly limiting permitted inbound and outbound communications. Another challenge is the lack of specialized skills that understand both modern cybersecurity principles and the specifics of the OT environment. Collaboration between IT and OT experts becomes essential to implement solutions that adequately balance security and operational requirements.